retirez en magasin sous 2h
magasin dès le lendemain
4 fois sans frais par carte bancaire
sous 30 jours
Dernières recherches
ebook
Le saviez vous ?
Lisez votre e-book sur ordinateur, tablette et mobile grâce aux applications :
Coups de cœur Cultura
Tous les passeurs de culture peuvent partager leurs découvertes !
Tu as aimé ce produit ? Partage dès maintenant ton coup de coeur :
We once imagined war as something that could be clearly seen.
Armies crossed borders. Ships moved across oceans. Aircraft appeared in the sky. Artillery shook cities. Soldiers occupied territory.
The battlefield had coordinates. Today, the battlefield is everywhere.
A message can cross a continent in seconds. A photograph can reach millions before anyone verifies whether it is real. A fabricated quotation can become part of public memory. A carefully constructed narrative can influence an election without a single soldier crossing a border. A hacked database can become a political weapon. A leaked document can reshape diplomatic calculations. An algorithm can determine which version of reality millions of people encounter first.
The weapons have changed. But the deeper objective has remained remarkably consistent:
Influence what people know, what they believe, what they fear, what they remember, and what they do.
This is the world of information warfare.
Information warfare is often reduced to propaganda, fake news, hacking, bots, or social-media manipulation. Each of these matters, but none is sufficient to explain the phenomenon.
Information warfare exists at the intersection of information, psychology, technology, intelligence, politics, military strategy, economics, media, institutions, and human behavior.
It is therefore not simply a technological problem.It is a human problem.
The central question of this book is not merely:"Is the information true?"
It is also:
Who created it? Why was it created? Who amplified it? Who benefited from its circulation? Which audience was it designed to reach? What emotion did it attempt to trigger? What behavior did it seek to produce? What information was excluded? And what happens after people believe it?